Head of Household Income Tax by State (2026)
Around 12 states maintain genuinely separate Head of Household brackets or standard deductions distinct from single filers. The remaining 38 states either default HoH to single brackets, levy a flat rate that makes the bracket distinction immaterial, or have no state income tax at all. The state-by-state map of where the HoH election actually saves money in 2026 is below.
Why HoH Status Exists at the State Level (Sometimes)
The federal Head of Household filing status was created to provide a middle ground between single and married filing jointly for unmarried taxpayers maintaining a household for a qualifying dependent. HoH brackets and standard deduction are wider than single but narrower than MFJ, recognising the financial responsibility of supporting a dependent without a second adult earner.
States vary in whether they replicate the federal mechanism. Some states have explicit HoH brackets (CA, NY, HI, KS, ME, MN, WI, CT). Others provide HoH-specific standard deductions on top of single brackets (NC, MO, NM, OK, OR, VT, DC). Others ignore the distinction entirely (PA, IL, IN, RI). Per the Tax Policy Center state tax structure summary, the variation reflects each state's historical decisions about whether to mirror federal status structure or simplify.
For a single parent with one qualifying child earning $60,000 in 2026, the state-tax savings from HoH versus single ranges from $0 (Pennsylvania, Illinois, Texas) to roughly $500 (California, with the wider brackets and larger standard deduction) to $700 (Minnesota, with the larger separate-HoH bracket structure). Federally the savings are more material, around $1,200 to $1,600 at this income.
The 50-State (plus DC) HoH Map
2026 HoH bracket treatment, HoH standard deduction or personal exemption, and notes on whether the HoH election produces material state-tax savings.
| State | HoH brackets | HoH std deduction / exemption | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Same as single | $3,000 HoH (vs $3,000 single) | No HoH-specific benefit beyond the federal HoH election |
| Alaska | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| Arizona | Flat 2.5% | Federal-conformity; ~$22,500 HoH | Flat rate; HoH std deduction conforms to federal |
| Arkansas | Same as single | $2,340 HoH (vs $2,340 single) | No HoH-specific benefit |
| California | Separate HoH brackets, wider | $10,540 HoH (vs $5,540 single) | Genuine HoH benefit; saves ~$300-$500/yr at moderate income |
| Colorado | Flat 4.4% | Federal-conformity | Flat rate; no separate HoH structure |
| Connecticut | Separate HoH brackets | $19,000 HoH personal exemption (phases out) | HoH treated as MFJ-similar at lower income |
| Delaware | Same as single | $3,250 HoH (vs $3,250 single) | No HoH-specific benefit |
| Florida | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| Georgia | Flat 5.39% | $5,400 HoH (vs $5,400 single) | Flat rate; no separate HoH structure |
| Hawaii | Separate HoH brackets | $3,212 HoH (vs $2,200 single) | Genuine HoH benefit; large for high-income HoH |
| Idaho | Same as MFJ-doubled | Federal-conformity ($22,500 HoH 2026) | HoH effectively gets MFJ-like brackets |
| Illinois | Flat 4.95% | $2,775 personal exemption (per filer) | Flat rate; HoH = single in tax effect |
| Indiana | Flat 3.05% | $1,000 + dependent exemptions | Flat rate; HoH benefit via dependent exemptions |
| Iowa | Flat 3.9% | $2,210 HoH (vs $2,210 single) | Flat rate; no separate HoH benefit |
| Kansas | Separate HoH brackets | $5,500 HoH (vs $3,500 single) | Genuine HoH standard deduction benefit |
| Kentucky | Flat 4.0% | $3,180 (single, MFJ, HoH) | Flat rate; no HoH-specific benefit |
| Louisiana | Same as single | $2,500 HoH personal exemption | Same brackets as single; HoH exemption higher |
| Maine | Separate HoH brackets | $21,275 HoH (vs $14,175 single) | Genuine HoH benefit; std deduction widened |
| Maryland | Same as single mostly | $2,400 HoH | Modest HoH benefit via exemption |
| Massachusetts | Flat 5% | $8,800 HoH personal exemption (vs $4,400 single) | Flat rate; HoH gets doubled exemption (penalty for those without HoH status) |
| Michigan | Flat 4.05% | $5,500 personal exemption (per filer) | Flat rate; no HoH-specific benefit |
| Minnesota | Separate HoH brackets | $22,500 HoH std (vs $14,950 single) | Genuine HoH benefit; significant for moderate income |
| Mississippi | Flat 4.4% above $10K | $3,400 HoH (vs $2,300 single) | Flat rate; HoH gets larger std deduction |
| Missouri | Same as single | $22,500 HoH (federal-conformity) | HoH std deduction conforms to federal |
| Montana | Same as MFJ-doubled | $15,750 HoH (federal-conformity) | HoH effectively gets MFJ-like brackets |
| Nebraska | Same as single | $10,500 HoH (vs $7,000 single) | Modest HoH benefit via std deduction |
| Nevada | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| New Hampshire | N/A | N/A | No tax on wages |
| New Jersey | Same as single | $1,500 HoH personal exemption (vs $1,000 single) | Modest HoH benefit via personal exemption |
| New Mexico | Federal-conformity | $22,500 HoH (federal) | Brackets follow federal-like structure |
| New York | Separate HoH brackets | $11,200 HoH (vs $8,000 single) | Genuine HoH benefit; saves ~$200-$400/yr moderate income |
| North Carolina | Flat 4.5% | $19,125 HoH (vs $12,750 single) | Flat rate; HoH gets 50% larger std deduction |
| North Dakota | Flat 1.95% | Federal-conformity | Flat rate; std deduction conforms to federal |
| Ohio | Same as single | Personal exemption per filer + dependents | Same brackets; benefit via dependent exemptions |
| Oklahoma | Same as single | $9,575 HoH (vs $6,350 single) | Modest HoH benefit via std deduction |
| Oregon | Same as single | $3,920 HoH (vs $2,605 single) | Modest HoH benefit via std deduction |
| Pennsylvania | Flat 3.07% | None (no std deduction in PA) | Flat rate; no HoH benefit at state level |
| Rhode Island | Same as single | $10,400 HoH (vs $10,400 single) | Same brackets and std deduction |
| South Carolina | Same as single | Federal-conformity | Brackets same as single; conforms to federal std deduction |
| South Dakota | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| Tennessee | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| Texas | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
| Utah | Flat 4.55% | Taxpayer credit (phases out) | Flat rate; benefit via UT taxpayer tax credit |
| Vermont | Same as single mostly | $10,425 HoH (vs $7,000 single) | Modest HoH benefit via std deduction |
| Virginia | Compressed brackets | $8,500 HoH (vs $4,500 single) | Std deduction nearly doubled for HoH |
| Washington | N/A | N/A | No income tax on wages |
| Washington DC | Same as single | $24,800 HoH (vs $14,300 single) | Std deduction nearly doubled for HoH |
| West Virginia | Same as single | $2,000 HoH personal exemption | Modest HoH benefit via personal exemption |
| Wisconsin | Separate HoH brackets | $17,790 HoH std (vs $13,230 single) | Genuine HoH benefit at moderate-to-high income |
| Wyoming | N/A | N/A | No state income tax |
Sources: each state's 2026 published filing-status tables and standard-deduction schedules. Numbers may differ from federal because some states partially conform and others do not. Verify with the relevant state Department of Revenue before filing.
States Where HoH Genuinely Helps
A handful of states provide enough HoH-specific structure that the election produces clear dollar savings versus single. The pattern is that states with progressive brackets and federal-conforming or partially-conforming standard deductions tend to deliver the most HoH benefit.
California has separate HoH brackets that are wider than single brackets at every band, plus a HoH standard deduction of $10,540 (against $5,540 single). At $60,000 income, the HoH filer saves approximately $400 compared to single. At $100,000 income, the savings grow to approximately $550.
New York provides a HoH standard deduction of $11,200 (against $8,000 single) and uses a bracket structure that is intermediate between single and MFJ. A $60,000 HoH filer saves approximately $250 versus single at the state level (NYC adds another ~$60 saving).
Minnesota has separate HoH brackets and a $22,500 HoH standard deduction (against $14,950 single). At $60,000 income, savings are approximately $700, the largest dollar HoH benefit at this income level among states.
Hawaii has separate HoH brackets that produce the largest dollar savings at high incomes, due to Hawaii's progressive bracket structure topping at 11%. A $200,000 HoH filer saves approximately $1,400 versus single in Hawaii.
States Where HoH Status Is Tax-Neutral
Pennsylvania's flat 3.07% income tax with no standard deduction makes HoH status tax-neutral at the state level. The federal HoH benefit is intact, but the Pennsylvania tax bill is identical whether the filer elects HoH or single. Similarly Illinois (4.95% flat with personal exemptions per filer regardless of status), Indiana (3.05% flat with dependent exemptions only), and the eight no-income-tax states (AK, FL, NV, NH, SD, TN, TX, WY) provide no HoH benefit at the state level.
For HoH filers in these states, the state filing-status decision does not affect the state tax bill, and the federal HoH benefit (around $1,200-$2,000 at moderate incomes) is the only tax saving from the status. Software defaults will still elect HoH where eligible, since federal eligibility is independent of state benefit.
Some flat-tax states with HoH-specific deductions sit in a middle ground. North Carolina's 4.5% flat rate produces the same per-dollar tax for HoH and single, but the HoH standard deduction is $19,125 (against $12,750 single), saving approximately $290 in state tax for a moderate-income HoH filer. Mississippi (4.4% flat above the $10K threshold) gives HoH a $3,400 standard deduction against $2,300 for single, saving approximately $50.
Worked Example: $60,000 HoH Filer with One Qualifying Child
Single parent earning $60,000 with one qualifying child living at home. State HoH tax versus state single tax in five representative states:
| State | Single tax | HoH tax | HoH savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | $2,210 | $1,810 | $400 |
| New York | $3,025 | $2,775 | $250 |
| Minnesota | $3,560 | $2,860 | $700 |
| North Carolina | $2,127 | $1,838 | $289 |
| Pennsylvania | $1,842 | $1,842 | $0 |
Numbers calculated from each state's 2026 published bracket and standard deduction tables. Excludes federal tax, federal HoH benefit (around $1,400 separately), and dependent-related state credits where they exist.
State-Federal Linkage and Common Errors
Most states require the state filing status to match federal. If you qualify for HoH federally, you elect HoH on the state return. The state benefit (or absence of benefit) follows automatically. Tax software handles the linkage in both directions.
Common error: a taxpayer recently divorced thinks HoH applies because they pay support to a child who lives primarily with the other parent. Per IRS Publication 501, the qualifying child must live with the HoH filer for more than half the year. The custodial parent typically claims HoH; the non-custodial parent typically files as single even if paying child support and claiming the child as a dependent for the dependency exemption (which is independent of HoH eligibility).
Another common error: a taxpayer with a parent in a separate household claims HoH using the parent as the qualifying person, but does not pay more than half the cost of maintaining the parent's residence. The parent-as-qualifying-person rule requires meeting the support and relationship tests; having a parent who lives in their own home does not automatically qualify the child for HoH unless the child pays more than half the parent's home maintenance costs.
FAQs: Head of Household by State
Do all states recognise Head of Household filing status?
Which states have the best HoH treatment?
Is HoH always better than single at the state level?
Do flat-tax states give any HoH benefit?
What are the federal HoH qualification rules I need to meet first?
What about widows and widowers?
Related Pages
Sources: each state's 2026 published filing-status tables and standard deduction schedules; IRS Publication 501 (Dependents, Standard Deduction, and Filing Information) for federal HoH eligibility. Verified May 2026. Educational reference, not personal tax advice.